Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Part 1 Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Hd 720p DOWNLOAD (Mirror #1)
a5c7b9f00b Batman has not been seen for ten years. A new breed of criminal ravages Gotham City, forcing 55-year-old Bruce Wayne back into the cape and cowl. But, does he still have what it takes to fight crime in a new era? Understandably, Batman: The Dark Knight Returns was just lifted straight from the graphic novels I haven't read, but damn, this "movie" was random.<br/><br/>Obviously, it was a stunt to make more money releasing this in two parts, but on the other hand, it was basically two movies – albeit, short ones at an hour apiece – with two completely different moods.<br/><br/>Batman: The Dark Knight Returns Part 1 sort of resembles what we know about the Batman legend and felt, at first, like it took place following the events of the motion picture, The Dark Knight Rises. Once it's learned that it's not, you get a few random events that only conclude barely enough to leave open for Part 2.<br/><br/>Part 2, although still random at spots, is much darker and more adult than most animated features I've seen. And when finished, a couple dozen questions appeared in my brain:<br/><br/>(This next paragraph is chock-full of spoilers. Skip if you don't appreciate those.)<br/><br/>How does everyone know who Clark is, or namely the President and FatWoman, er CatWoman? Why even mention the brief background of the Justice League and leave holes in that story? How can the Joker withstand a dagger in the eye #1, and #2 continue fighting and navigating, hell, thinking? Why was it set back in the 1980s? Why was Batman so evil at times, actually shoots guns and randomly beats up police? Since when did Batman murder people (he admits this to the Joker)? What happened to the old Robin – or, for the love of God, stop brining up something only insiders would know! Why were Superman and Batman such enemies? And why did Bruce hate Clark so much, other than the fact Superman fought for peace? Why was it was a bad idea for Superman to detonate a bomb in space – sort of? – verses in the city? Further, since when would a nuclear bomb – which he's survived before, make him turn into James Wood's Hades from Disney's Hercules? Where did the "Mutants" come from and why were they even called that since, all-but-one, were perfectly normal idiots with red Cylon-style glasses? Why did Batman go out of his way to make sure the new Commissioner hated him and later, why would she all-of-a-sudden refuse to attack him when given the (15th) chance? When did Batman begin using (the absent) Scarecrow's hallucinate gas? And finally, not really a question, but a nice observation: It's good to know that if a multistory apartment building's on fire, the quickest and most effective way to put it out is with just a few buckets of water. An entire room's fire seemed to get extinguished with one bucket of water!<br/><br/>(End of Spoilers. You can resume now.)<br/><br/>Perhaps, I am taking all this too seriously, but that was the idea I got from the filmmakers: a deeper, darker and most realistic animated Batman feature.<br/><br/>And although this was definitely an alternative (DC) universe, much like TV's Smallville, this cartoon felt like 15 animated features were created before this, much like what Marvel did to lead up to The Avengers. But, at least in that great movie, I didn't have to question every aspect when a new plot line formed.<br/><br/>As much as this review, so far, has looked like a bashing, I actually did have a little bit of fun – from time to time. If you can put away everything you know about these characters you might have grown up with, i.e. completely forget they've ever used to stand up for good and justice or even existed at all, then you might enjoy the whole experience. It's definitely one of the best Batman features I've watched in a while (not a big fan of Christopher Nolan's "Gotham's Jesus"). It's a different Batman, faithful to the character tailored by Frank Miller. This Batman is old, angry and not a bit soft. He knows what he needs to do and he does it.<br/><br/>The animation is dynamic and nicely drawn (not in the anime- influenced style of Flashpoint: Paradox). This is exactly how comic book adaptations should be made.<br/><br/>Sad thing is, best DC adaptations come in direct-to-video format. Recently I tried watching Flash and Arrow, huge letdowns, if you ask me. But "The Dark Knigh Returns" is the real deal. It isn't fake, it has the spirit and the atmosphere.<br/><br/>Now I'm off to my Batcave to watch the second part. The budgets for the DC Universe Animated Original Movies only allow for films of about 70 to 75 minutes in length. The graphic novel The Dark Knight Returns is long enough that it couldn't be adapted as a single animated film without seriously compromising the original story. Therefore, the film has been split into two parts to allow for a more faithful adaptation. Fairly faithful. This movie is not as faithful the animated version of Frank Miller's Batman: Year One where the entire movie was a page for page recreation, but it is perhaps the second most faithful adaptation of a graphic novel to movie in the DC Animated series. Some scenes are changed around, some scenes are removed, some characters are visually altered but the story in the movie remains the same as the story in the graphic novel, and there are no sweeping changes to the original story. The biggest omission is that Batman does not have narration in the movie like he does in the graphic novel. In the graphic novel Frank Miller wrote a constant line of narration from the point of view of Batman's thoughts and his war journal. This narration did more than just explain the actions that the reader was seeing and actually revealed some important story information that was not otherwise seen or discussed. The filmmakers decided to leave out this narration and let the visual aspect of the story stand on its own. In the 1980s, the time when Frank Miller wrote The Dark Knight Returns graphic novel, Dick Grayson had already left Batman's side to become the hero Nightwing. He was replaced by an orphan and street hooligan named Jason Todd, whom readers greatly disliked. Eventually DC Comics created a publicity stunt to put Jason Todd's fate in the reader's hands. In a comic book story line called A Death in the Family, the Joker had beaten Jason Todd to near death. DC Comics then created a 1-900 phone number for readers to vote whether Todd lived or died. The votes were for his death and Jason was killed in the next issue. While no actual reference is given to how Jason died in The Dark Knight Returns, it is not unreasonable to assume that the events depicted in A Death in the Family could also have happened in the alternate timeline that The Dark Knight Returns takes place in. An interesting note is that The Dark Knight Returns was published 2 years before the storyline in which Jason Todd was murdered. Eventually a third Robin named Tim Drake would join Batman on his war on crime, but The Dark Knight Returns was written before that character was created and does not take this into account. For another DC animated film that deals with Jason Todd as Robin, <a href="/title/tt1569923/">Batman: Under the Red Hood (2010)</a> may be of interest. It is not explained where Dick Grayson is during the events of this story. As stated, he was not the Robin that was killed and brought Bruce Wayne to decide on retiring as Batman. In the original graphic novel when Batman is first defeated by the Mutant leader, Batman begins to monologue to himself as if he were speaking to Dick Grayson but does not reveal any information about his fate in this story. However, in Frank Miller's graphic novel sequel to this story Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again it is revealed that Dick Grayson went crazy from years of rejection from Batman and became the second Joker. It is set in an alternate version of the 1980s, in a similar manner as the film adaptation of <a href="/title/tt0409459/">Watchmen (2009)</a>. When the story was originally written this was a contemporary time setting and only became an alternate history setting after it took many years to produce as a movie. For more of Frank Miller's take on Batman you may enjoy Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again, All-Star Batman and Robin the Boy Wonder, Batman: Year One and its <a href="/title/tt1672723/">animated adaptation</a>. For more of superheros in a dystopian future you may enjoy Paul Pope's Batman: Year 100 and Kaare Andrews' Spider-Man: Reign.
ความคิดเห็น